8 case citations checked: 4 verified (2 with wording that differs from the opinion), 1 case confirmed, 2 could not be verified, 1 not found.
Verified means: the citation exists, it resolves to the case named, and, when the opinion text was available to check, any quoted language attributed to it appears in that text. A row says when a detected quote was not checked. It does NOT mean the case is still good law, does not report treatment (overruled, reversed, superseded), and does not mean the case supports the proposition it was cited for. Case confirmed means the case was confirmed by name, court, and year, but the reporter citation itself is not on CourtListener's record, so the volume and page could not be checked. On a quotation, “Found — minor punctuation difference” means the words match and only punctuation or hyphenation differs. Belongs to a different case means the citation or docket number exists but is another case. Not confirmed means the public record could not answer; it is not the same as not found.
The citation exists and resolves to the case named. Where a quote was checked, the quoted language appears in the opinion text; a row says when a detected quote was not checked or its wording differs from the opinion.
| # | Citation as written | Finding | Opinion it resolved to | Quoted passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 | Verified | Not on record | — |
| 2 | Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 | Verified | Not on record | — |
| 3 | Okafor v. Belmont Transit Authority, 341 F. Supp. 3d 220 | Wording differs from the opinion — compare before filing | Not on record | Quoted: “a common carrier owes no duty absent gross negligence” — Wording differs from the opinion — compare before filing Closest passage we found in the opinion (for comparison): “We have long recognized that a common carrier owes a heightened duty of care to its passengers, not a duty triggered only by gross negligence.” (paragraph 2) |
| 4 | Delgado v. Summit Ridge Apartments, LLC, 229 F. Supp. 3d 884 | Wording differs from the opinion — compare before filing | Not on record | Quoted: “a landlord who personally supervises renovations assumes strict liability for every subcontractor on site” — Wording differs from the opinion — compare before filing No similar passage found in the opinion. |
These cases exist in the public record, but their reporter citations are not on file, so the volume and page could not be checked.
| # | Citation as written | Finding | Opinion it resolved to | Quoted passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Harmon v. Castellan Freight Co., 214 F.3d 902 | Case confirmed: this case exists, but its reporter citation isn't on file, so the volume and page could not be checked. | Not on record | — |
Cite11 could not confirm these citations against the public record. Each row states the specific reason and what to do about it.
| # | Citation as written | Finding | Opinion it resolved to | Quoted passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Ngo v. Harrison, 2021 WL 998877 | This is a Westlaw/LEXIS proprietary citation number, not a court reporter Cite11 can check Proprietary citation (Westlaw/Lexis). Supply the reporter citation to check. |
Not on record | — |
| 7 | Price v. Danvers Mfg. Co., 77 F.3d 410 | Not checked — try again CourtListener did not respond in time. Try checking this citation again. |
Not checked | Not checked |
No source in the public record Cite11 checks answers to these citations. Treat as unverified and confirm in your primary source.
| # | Citation as written | Finding | Opinion it resolved to | Quoted passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Whitfield v. Larchmont Holdings, 998 F.4th 112 | No public record found We searched by citation and by case name and found no matching case. No match here is not proof the case doesn't exist; confirm it in the original source before relying on it. |
Not on record | — |
Every citation below still needs attorney action before you rely on it. Tick each off as you resolve it.
8 case citations checked: 4 verified (2 with wording that differs from the opinion), 1 case confirmed, 2 could not be verified, 1 not found. At least one citation had the case confirmed, with the reporter citation not on file, so the volume and page could not be checked. At least one citation had no public record found. At least one citation fell outside Cite11's confirmed coverage. At least one citation could not be checked. Okafor v. Belmont Transit Authority, 341 F. Supp. 3d 220: the wording of the quotation differs from the opinion; compare before filing. Delgado v. Summit Ridge Apartments, LLC, 229 F. Supp. 3d 884: the wording of the quotation differs from the opinion; compare before filing. Ngo v. Harrison, 2021 WL 998877 was outside coverage. No public record was found for Whitfield v. Larchmont Holdings, 998 F.4th 112.
Every case citation listed above was checked against CourtListener's case-law and docket archives as of 2026-10-19. A citation is confirmed only when the case it cites and the case that citation number actually refers to are the same case. Language quoted from a case is compared with the opinion text when that text is available; a row says when a detected quote was not checked. No AI is used anywhere in this report. Every result is produced by fixed rules and record matching.
Full plain-language explanation of what this check covers and what it does not: https://cite11.com/methodology